Skip to main content
Performance

Proven Across 10+ Benchmarks

BEAM, Fiction.liveBench, NIAH, LongMemEval, LoCoMo, and more. 10+ benchmark families, tested across 10+ models, from 8K to 20M tokens. We published the results — including where we lose.

Results at a Glance

10+ benchmark families · 10+ models · 8K to 20M tokens · $0 per query offline. Tap any card for full results.

BEAM: Scale Invariance

BEAM measures structured reasoning across increasing context sizes. CosmicMind holds 79–80% accuracy from 100K to 10M tokens — +44pp above the best published LIGHT SOTA. The line is flat. That is the point.

Model Agnostic

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 79.9%qwen2.5:32b (local): 79.4%

Cloud and local models produce near-identical results.

Key Insight

Most systems degrade as context grows. CosmicMind's accuracy stays flat across 100× scale increase. The intelligence is in the cognition layer, not the model.

Fiction.liveBench

Narrative comprehension across long fictional texts. CosmicMind achieves 87.5% using a local 8B model — beating o3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Model: ollama/llama3.1:8b

NIAH: On-Device Retrieval at Extreme Scale

Multiple Needle-in-a-Haystack across every combination of document depth and context length, testing 10 needles simultaneously. Run entirely on ollama/llama3.1:8b with no internet connection. 100% accuracy at 5M+ tokens.

Context Length
Depth
8K
32K
128K
512K
1M
2M
5M
10M
20M
10%
96.2%
97%
97.5%
98%
98.5%
99%
100%
100%
100%
20%
95.8%
96.5%
97.2%
97.8%
98.3%
99%
100%
100%
100%
30%
95.5%
96.8%
97%
97.5%
98%
98.8%
100%
100%
100%
40%
96%
96.3%
97.3%
97.9%
98.4%
99.2%
100%
100%
100%
50%
95.2%
96%
97.1%
97.6%
98.2%
99%
100%
100%
100%
60%
95.9%
96.7%
97.4%
98.1%
98.6%
99.1%
100%
100%
100%
70%
96.1%
96.4%
97.2%
97.7%
98.3%
98.9%
100%
100%
100%
80%
95.6%
96.2%
97%
97.5%
98.1%
99%
100%
100%
100%
90%
95.4%
96.6%
97.3%
97.8%
98.4%
99.2%
100%
100%
100%
95%
96.3%
96.9%
97.5%
98%
98.5%
99%
100%
100%
100%
99%
95.7%
96.1%
97.1%
97.6%
98.2%
98.8%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99.5–99.9%
99.0–99.4%
<99%

>99% combined accuracy across all test points. Accuracy improves with scale — the opposite of degradation.

LongMemEval: The Compounding Thesis

Multi-session memory evaluation. CosmicMind goes from 56.6% at 115K to 83.0% at 1.5M — a +26.4pp improvement as context grows.

More data doesn't just maintain accuracy — it improves it. The cognitive architecture compounds understanding across sessions.

LoCoMo: Approaching Human Ceiling

Long-conversation memory benchmark. CosmicMind closes the gap to the human performance ceiling.

CosmicMind

53.2%

Hybrid architecture

GPT-4 + RAG

50–55%

Retrieval-augmented

Human Ceiling

~56%

Upper bound

Hardware Tiers

CosmicMind runs anywhere — from edge devices to enterprise-scale clusters. Same architecture, same accuracy, scaled to your hardware.

Light

Edge & mobile deployment

M-series MacJetson OrinHigh-end laptop

16–32 GB RAM, SSD

NIAH 20M100%
Fiction.liveBench87.5%
Retrieval<1s

Regular

Workstation & on-prem

NVIDIA A100/H100Multi-GPU serverCloud VM

64–256 GB RAM, NVMe

BEAM 10M80.5%
LongMemEval 1.5M83.0%
Concurrent users10+

SuperMassive

Enterprise & research scale

Multi-node cluster8× H100 SXMInfiniBand fabric

1+ TB RAM, distributed

Scale ceiling100M+
LoCoMo (human-level)53.2%
Cost per query$0.01

Where We Don't Win (Yet)

Honest benchmarking means showing the losses too. These are areas where specialized systems outperform CosmicMind — and where we are actively improving.

-2.6pp

LongMemEval (s subset)

On the single-session subset of LongMemEval, RAG-based approaches outperform CosmicMind by 2.6 percentage points. CosmicMind is optimized for cross-session synthesis, not single-turn lookups.

-10 to -20pp

EgoLifeQA

EgoRAG, a retrieval system purpose-built for egocentric video QA, outperforms CosmicMind by 10–20pp on this multimodal benchmark. CosmicMind is a text-native system and does not yet ingest video or image data.

Cost & Efficiency

CosmicMind delivers frontier-level performance at a fraction of the cost. On local models, the cost is zero.

MetricCosmicMindGPT-5.4Advantage
Cost per query$0.01$6.6799.85%
Annual cost (1K queries/day)$125K$83.25M99.85%
Max context (single pass)20M tokens1M tokens20×

CosmicMind vs Context Stuffing (NIAH)

Context stuffing degrades rapidly past 128K tokens and becomes impossible beyond the native window. CosmicMind keeps accuracy improving at every scale, reaching 100% at 5M+.

Raw Accuracy Data

ContextCosmicMindStuffing
8K96.2%99.5%
32K97%97.2%
128K97.5%91.8%
512K98%78.4%
1M98.5%62.1%
2M99%45.3%
5M100%N/A
10M100%N/A
20M100%N/A

Retrieval Speed at Scale

Sub-second retrieval even at 20 million tokens.

Retrieval time at 20M tokens: 270ms (0.27 seconds) — fast enough for real-time applications.

A Note on Language

We use cognitive metaphors — neurons, synapses, cognition — throughout CosmicMind. These are not claims of artificial consciousness. They are precise analogies for how our patent-pending architecture functions.

The Numbers Speak for Themselves

10+ benchmarks. 10+ models. 8K to 20M tokens. Sub-second retrieval. $0 per query offline. See what CosmicMind can do for your team.